When does revenue from a nonprofit’s side activities trigger Unrelated Business Income Tax?
Determining whether a worker should be classified as a 1099 contractor or W-2 employee requires more than simply choosing the arrangement that is easier or less expensive for the business.
Companies must evaluate the actual working relationship under applicable federal and state rules, as misclassification can lead to significant tax, payroll, and legal consequences.
Choosing contractor status because it is cheaper or administratively easier can create expensive problems later. If a worker should have been an employee, the business may owe federal income tax withholding, Social Security, Medicare, unemployment taxes, state payroll taxes, interest, and penalties. Misclassified workers may also assert claims for overtime, minimum wages, unemployment benefits, workers’ compensation, or employee benefits. The 1099 vs W2 question is therefore not about which form is easier to issue. It is a tax and legal determination based on the relationship. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) did not generally replace existing federal standards for determining worker status.
For federal employment tax purposes, the IRS common law test focuses on the degree of control and independence in the relationship. The IRS groups relevant facts into three categories: behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship. Behavioral factors examine instructions, training, schedules, and how work is performed. Financial factors consider investments, unreimbursed expenses, payment methods, and whether the worker offers services to the market. Relationship factors include contracts, benefits, permanency, and whether the services are a key business activity. No single factor determines the worker’s classification. Businesses should evaluate the complete relationship and weigh all relevant facts, rather than relying solely on the contract title, payment method, or any other individual factor.
Many states apply a stricter three-part ABC test for at least some wage, employment, or unemployment laws. Under the standard used in California and New Jersey, the hiring business generally must establish all three elements: the worker is free from its control and direction, performs work outside the usual course of the business, and is customarily engaged in an independently established trade or occupation. Failure on one element can result in Employee Status under the applicable law. That makes multistate hiring challenging because a worker may satisfy the federal test yet fail a state test. State-specific review is therefore essential.
The most common mistakes begin with labels. A contract calling someone an independent contractor does not make it so, and issuing Form 1099-NEC does not settle the issue. Other warning signs include controlling work hours or methods, providing the worker’s tools, reimbursing ordinary business expenses, restricting outside clients, offering employee-type benefits, or keeping the relationship open-ended. Risk also rises when contractors perform substantially the same work as employees or provide services central to the company’s business. Independent Contractor misclassification often develops gradually as an engagement changes. Businesses should reassess long-running contractor relationships instead of relying on the original arrangement indefinitely.
If a business identifies a possible misclassification, it should first document the affected workers, years, payments, duties, and applicable federal and state tests before changing treatment. For eligible taxpayers, the IRS Voluntary Classification Settlement Program allows workers to be reclassified as employees prospectively. Applicants file Form 8952 and, if accepted, generally pay 10 percent of the employment tax liability that would have been due for the most recent tax year under reduced Section 3509 rates. Current audits can affect eligibility. A payroll review, sometimes supported by Forensic Accounting, can help quantify exposure and preserve records before remediation decisions are made.
For more than four decades, Bennett Thrasher has provided businesses and individuals with strategic business guidance and solutions through professional tax, audit, advisory, and business process outsourcing services. Contact Zack Leder, partner in charge of Bennett Thrasher’s Business Tax Practice, or call us at 770.396.2200.
Back to Q&A
Never miss an update. Sign up to receive our monthly newsletter to unlock our experts' insights.
Subscribe Now