What is the difference between pre-assessment and post-assessment penalties?

< Back to Q&A

Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts reporting penalties follow a structured tax assessment process when the IRS evaluates whether a taxpayer failed to file FinCEN Form 114, commonly known as the FBAR. When individuals or entities challenge these penalties, the strategy depends on whether the penalty is being disputed before or after assessment. Understanding how pre-assessment vs post-assessment penalties operate helps determine the best path for tax dispute resolution and potential penalty reduction. The IRS guidance for FBAR comes from the Bank Secrecy Act and Title 31, which differs from other IRS Tax Penalties administered under Title 26.

How the IRS Issues Pre Assessment FBAR Penalties

Before a penalty becomes final, the IRS sends correspondence notifying the taxpayer of an intended FBAR penalty. The most important stages in pre assessment are Pre Letter 3709 and Post Letter 3709. According to the IRS Internal Revenue Manual (IRM 8.11.6.2), the IRS allows certain taxpayers to request Fast Track Settlement if the 30-day FBAR Letter 3709 has not been issued. Fast Track Settlement is a collaborative process that may limit penalty calculation outcomes by allowing negotiation with IRS Appeals at an earlier stage.

Pre Letter 3709

If the taxpayer appeals before receiving the Letter 3709, the case can often be resolved faster and with more flexibility. Because no penalty has been finalized, IRS examiners retain discretion to reduce or waive penalties, and taxpayers may obtain negotiated outcomes without going through prolonged litigation. The early negotiation option is similar to methods used in Commercial Dispute Resolution where parties seek to reach agreement before formal assessments or legal rulings create rigid outcomes.

Post Letter 3709

When Letter 3709 is issued, the IRS formally proposes an FBAR penalty and gives the taxpayer 30 days to respond. The letter outlines potential penalties based on whether the IRS classified the failure to file as non-willful or willful. For non-willful violations, the penalty is up to 10,000 dollars per year. For willful violations, the penalty can reach the greater of 100,000 dollars or 50 percent of the account balance. If the taxpayer agrees, they sign Form 13449 and pay. If they disagree, they must submit a written protest and request an Appeals hearing.

Appealing FBAR Penalties: Pre Assessment vs Post Assessment Rights

Once a taxpayer submits an appeal during the pre assessment phase, IRS Appeals requires at least 365 days remaining on the FBAR statute of limitations. This procedural requirement restricts cases that are submitted too late and protects the IRS right to assess penalties if negotiations fail. If the IRS assesses the penalty before a taxpayer appeals, they lose the ability to appeal under the pre-assessment process. Instead, the taxpayer must use post-assessment channels, such as a Collection Due Process hearing, or may opt to pay and sue for a refund in federal court.

Appealing before assessment thus provides broader tools and a greater possibility that penalties will be reduced or waived. After assessment, the IRS is more restrictive, and disputes mimic litigation pathways under IRS vs state penalties frameworks.

Post Assessment FBAR Penalties and Taxpayer Challenges

Once the penalty is officially assessed, IRS collection actions can begin. The taxpayer can still challenge penalties but must do so after assessment, either through IRS Appeals or by paying and pursuing federal litigation. These cases become more complex because post-assessment FBAR disputes involve issues similar to audit penalties, burden of proof, and the taxpayer’s ability to demonstrate reasonable cause.

Title 31 FBAR penalties do not follow deficiency procedures, so they are not automatically eligible for Tax Court review. Instead, challenges typically arise in federal district court after the taxpayer has paid some or all of the penalty. Statute rules differ from disputes related to Economic Nexus reporting or other federal tax obligations, meaning legal counsel must choose the proper jurisdiction before filing challenges.

Managerial Approval and Penalty Defenses

Recent federal decisions on penalty approval under Section 6751(b)(1) impact many penalty cases but do not automatically apply to FBAR penalties because FBAR enforcement falls under Title 31. However, IRS procedures require examiner discretion and proper documentation for willful FBAR penalties, making internal review an indirect defense. Defenses are stronger when taxpayers demonstrate lack of intent, reasonable cause, or reliance on tax advisors. Maintaining strong documentation can reduce penalties during early appeals and should be integrated into tax planning & consulting strategies for taxpayers with offshore accounts.

Conclusion

The distinction between pre-assessment and post-assessment penalties directly impacts how a taxpayer challenges FBAR enforcement. During pre assessment, taxpayers can negotiate reductions, utilize expedited settlement procedures, and potentially avoid penalties altogether. Once penalties are assessed, taxpayers face more restrictive options and carry greater legal burdens. Understanding the tax assessment process and strategically timing an appeal improves outcomes, controls penalty exposure, and supports compliant reporting practices, particularly in international tax environments. For individuals or businesses with offshore accounts, proactive review of filing obligations should be integrated into audit defense planning and advisory services to reduce future exposure.

Back to Q&A