By: Michael Hoover | 03/31/26
Key Takeaways
Private Equity firms are not just participating in restaurant mergers and acquisitions. They are shaping the direction of the industry heading into 2026.
The underlying math is simple. PE firms are sitting on significant capital reserves, and restaurants with strong unit economics offer a path to scalable returns. In 2025, Dave’s Hot Chicken sold a majority stake to Roark Capital for over $1 billion, signaling continued appetite for high growth concepts. At the same time, recent interest rate cuts have made borrowing slightly more attractive, improving deal feasibility.
But PE is not chasing just any concept. The focus has narrowed.
Buyers are prioritizing:
This selectivity reflects broader market conditions. While total deal value increased roughly 15% year over year globally, transaction volume declined by about 30% in the restaurant sector. Buyers are walking away from marginal deals and concentrating capital on high quality platforms.
Private ownership also allows operators to make longer-term investments. Turnarounds rarely happen in a quarter. In many cases, it takes years to reposition a brand, improve supply chains, and integrate technology.
That is where Post-Merger Integration becomes critical. PE backed platforms often unlock value through centralized purchasing, shared technology systems, and operational discipline across portfolios.
For restaurant leaders, the takeaway is straightforward. If the unit economics are strong and the concept scales cleanly, private equity is still very much interested.
One of the more interesting shifts in mergers and acquisitions restaurants is who is doing the buying.
Historically, franchisors acquired franchisees to consolidate control. That model is evolving. Multi-unit franchisees are now acquiring franchisors outright.
Examples from 2025 illustrate the trend clearly. Sun Holdings acquired brands like Uncle Julio’s and Bar Louie. Operators who once followed the system are now owning it.
Why is this happening?
Because the best franchisees understand the business better than anyone else. They know:
That insight translates into confidence and capital deployment.
This shift also changes deal structure. Traditional franchise agreements assumed a separation between brand ownership and operations. When franchisees become owners, that distinction disappears. Valuations increasingly reflect operational performance rather than just brand equity.
There is also a strategic advantage. Franchisee buyers can move faster on operational changes because they are not managing from a distance. They have first hand experience managing franchise challenges and often have already solved them at scale.
For sellers, this creates a new buyer pool. For buyers, it creates a more competitive landscape where experience matters as much as capital.
Public markets have not been kind to many restaurant brands in recent years.
Declining traffic, rising costs, and shifting consumer behavior have pressured same store sales. In one example, Denny’s stock dropped from over $6 per share to around $4 before its sale. That kind of valuation compression creates opportunity.
Private buyers are stepping in.
Taking a restaurant company private offers several advantages:
This is particularly important in a sector where change takes time. Renovating menus, redesigning stores, and implementing new systems are not quick fixes.
The environment has also created a mismatch. Public investors expect near term performance, while restaurant turnarounds require patience. Private ownership bridges that gap.
At the same time, PE firms bring operational expertise. Research and industry observation suggest that private ownership often leads to improved food quality, fewer compliance issues, and stronger operational consistency.
Not every deal succeeds. Some past transactions, like sale leaseback structures that burdened operators with high fixed costs, have created challenges. But the broader trend is clear.
Lower valuations combined with operational upside are pulling legacy brands off public exchanges and into private portfolios.
Economic pressure has created another source of deal flow. Distressed restaurant brands.
Inflation, labor shortages, and commodity volatility have pushed margins to the edge. Beef prices, energy costs, and wage inflation continue to strain operators. At the same time, consumer spending has softened as households manage higher everyday expenses.
The result is predictable. Underperformance, closures, and in some cases, bankruptcy.
For buyers, this environment presents opportunity.
Distressed acquisitions allow investors to:
But these deals come with complexity.
Due diligence becomes more intensive, not less. Buyers must evaluate:
This is where experienced advisors and M&A Transaction Advisory Services play a key role. Distressed deals often move quickly and require a clear understanding of both risks and upside.
It is also worth noting that not all distressed brands are broken. Some are simply misaligned with current market conditions. With the right operational changes and capital structure, they can return to profitability.
As economic pressure continues into 2026, distressed restaurant brands will remain a significant driver of acquisitions.
If there is one theme that cuts across every deal, it is technology.
Restaurant valuations are no longer based solely on revenue and EBITDA. Buyers are increasingly pricing in operational capabilities.
Technology now influences value in several ways:
The shift is tied directly to industry pressures.
Labor shortages continue to impact operations. Technology allows restaurants to reallocate labor to higher value tasks. At the same time, AI driven tools are improving forecasting, reducing waste, and enhancing customer experience.
There is also a risk component. As restaurants adopt more digital systems, cybersecurity threats increase. Buyers are factoring this into diligence and valuation models.
Brands that lack these capabilities face downward pressure on valuation. They require additional investment post-acquisition, which reduces buyer willingness to pay a premium.
On the other side, operators that have already invested in technology are seeing stronger interest and higher multiples.
Tax policy is also playing a role. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act allows for 100% bonus depreciation and expanded interest deductions. That improves cash flow and encourages reinvestment in technology and infrastructure.
Combined with Tax Credits & Incentives, these provisions can materially impact deal economics.
The message is clear. Technology is no longer optional. It is a core driver of value in restaurant mergers.
What financial metrics do buyers focus on when evaluating a restaurant acquisition?
Buyers prioritize unit level EBITDA, same store sales growth, and margin stability. They also evaluate traffic trends, average ticket size, and labor efficiency. Consistency across locations matters as much as growth. Strong unit economics often carry more weight than overall revenue when assessing long term scalability.
How does private equity typically exit a restaurant investment?
Private equity firms usually exit through a sale to another PE firm, a strategic buyer, or occasionally through a public offering. The goal is to improve operations, expand the footprint, and increase valuation over a three-to-seven-year period before monetizing the investment.
What tax considerations come into play when selling a restaurant business?
Tax considerations include asset versus stock sale treatment, capital gains implications, and depreciation recapture. Recent legislation such as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act can influence timing and structure. Proper planning helps maximize after tax proceeds and align with broader financial goals.
How does buying a distressed restaurant brand differ from a standard acquisition?
Distressed acquisitions involve higher risk and more complex diligence. Buyers must assess liabilities, lease obligations, and operational gaps. Pricing is typically lower, but the turnaround effort is greater. Success depends on identifying whether issues are structural, brand or operational and whether they can be corrected.
What role does due diligence play in restaurant M&A transactions?
Due diligence validates financial performance, identifies risks, and confirms growth assumptions. It covers operations, legal exposure, tax compliance, and technology systems. In restaurant acquisitions, it also focuses heavily on unit level performance and consistency across locations, which ultimately drives valuation and deal structure.
Never miss an update. Sign up to receive our monthly newsletter to unlock our experts' insights.
Subscribe Now