A transfer pricing audit is a formal examination conducted by tax authorities to evaluate whether transactions between related entities are priced in accordance with the arm’s length principle. This principle requires that intercompany prices mirror those that would be agreed upon by unrelated parties under comparable circumstances. The audit typically reviews goods, services, intellectual property, financing arrangements, and cost allocations across jurisdictions. Tax authorities view transfer pricing as a high-risk compliance area because it directly affects how profits are allocated among countries. As global transparency initiatives expand and governments seek to protect their tax bases, the audit of transfer pricing has become more frequent, more data-driven, and more technically rigorous.
Transfer pricing audits generally begin with a risk assessment phase. Authorities use data analytics, country-by-country reports, and benchmarking tools to identify unusual profit patterns, persistent losses, or significant payments to related parties in lower-tax jurisdictions. Once selected, taxpayers receive formal information requests for documentation supporting their pricing policies.
Auditors then perform a detailed functional analysis, reviewing how functions, assets, and risks are allocated among group entities. Benchmarking studies are scrutinized to assess whether comparable companies were appropriately selected and whether adjustments were justified. In some cases, authorities conduct their own independent benchmarking using alternative databases.
In the United States, an IRS transfer pricing audit often follows a phased examination approach, progressing from issue identification to economic analysis and resolution discussions. Globally, tax authorities increasingly collaborate through joint or multilateral audits, especially for large multinational groups.
Several recurring issues arise during transfer pricing examinations. One of the most common is insufficient or inconsistent documentation. Basic documentation that lacks depth, particularly for non-routine or high-value transactions, often fails to meet audit expectations.
Another frequent issue involves weak functional analyses. When intercompany agreements do not align with actual conduct, auditors may challenge the economic substance of transactions. Comparable selection is also a major area of dispute, especially when internal comparables are dismissed without sufficient justification or when external comparables are poorly explained.
Additional Transfer Pricing Challenges include business restructurings that are not adequately analyzed, changes in profitability without clear commercial rationale, and failure to demonstrate that pricing outcomes fall within arm’s length ranges. These issues can lead to adjustments, penalties, and, in cross-border cases, potential double taxation.
Preparation begins well before an audit notice is received. Companies should maintain comprehensive and contemporaneous documentation that clearly explains their transfer pricing policies, methodologies, and economic rationale. This typically includes a master file, local files, benchmarking studies, and supporting agreements.
A robust functional analysis is essential. It should identify key value drivers, describe economically significant activities, and clearly allocate risks and assets. Documentation should also reconcile intercompany transaction amounts to statutory accounts, as discrepancies often trigger penalties and credibility concerns.
Many companies also prepare an internal defense file that anticipates audit questions and organizes supporting evidence. This approach streamlines responses, conserves internal resources, and strengthens the overall audit position. A practical transfer pricing audit checklist can help ensure that documentation, agreements, and filings are complete and consistent across jurisdictions.
Transfer pricing audits are no longer limited to large multinational enterprises. Any company with cross-border related-party transactions may be subject to scrutiny, particularly as tax authorities expand data sharing and enforcement efforts. A proactive Transfer Pricing Strategy that aligns operational reality with documented policies is critical.
Businesses should regularly review their transfer pricing models to reflect changes in supply chains, market conditions, and regulatory developments, including emerging trade considerations such as the 2025 tariff environment. Coordination between tax, finance, and legal teams is also essential to address overlapping risks, including State and Local Tax Issues and treaty positions.
Finally, consistency matters. When intercompany pricing, contracts, and actual conduct align, companies are better positioned to defend their results and resolve audits efficiently, whether through examination, negotiation, or advance planning tools such as a Transfer Pricing Agreement or advance pricing arrangement.
Transfer pricing audits are commonly triggered by risk indicators such as recurring losses, sudden profit shifts, large intercompany payments, or inconsistencies between tax filings across jurisdictions. Tax authorities also use data analytics and country-by-country reports to identify transactions that lack clear commercial rationale or deviate significantly from industry norms.
Tax authorities typically request transfer pricing documentation such as master files, local files, benchmarking studies, intercompany agreements, invoices, and accounting records. Additional support may include functional analyses, reconciliations to statutory accounts, and evidence demonstrating that transactions were conducted in line with arm’s length standards.
The duration of a transfer pricing audit varies by jurisdiction and complexity. Straightforward cases may be resolved within several months, while more complex or multi-jurisdictional audits can last several years. Timely responses, organized documentation, and cooperative engagement often help shorten the process.
If tax authorities determine that transfer prices are not arm’s length, they may propose income adjustments, assess penalties, and charge interest. In cross-border cases, adjustments can also result in double taxation unless relief is obtained through appeals, mutual agreement procedures, or treaty mechanisms.
Businesses can reduce audit risk by maintaining current and detailed documentation, regularly testing pricing outcomes against benchmarks, and ensuring consistency between agreements and actual conduct. Periodic reviews of transfer pricing policies and proactive issue identification help address potential concerns before they attract regulatory attention.
For more than four decades, Bennett Thrasher has provided businesses and individuals with strategic business guidance and solutions through professional tax, audit, advisory, and business process outsourcing services. Contact Ben Miller, partner in charge of Bennett Thrasher’s Transfer Pricing practice, or call us at 770.396.2200.
Never miss an update. Sign up to receive our monthly newsletter to unlock our experts' insights.
Subscribe Now